Philosophy |
||
| Because
learners are dynamic, so too must learning be dynamic. Accordingly, I feel the teacher must learn to
identify, through the varied classroom contexts and time spent within that
realm through trial and error, how best to facilitate this learning. The findings will likely show that some
students learn best independently, while others prefer cooperative methods, and
that teaching should simultaneously cultivate each. As
a teacher, it is ultimately my responsibility to establish classroom procedures
at the outset of the school year, allowing for revision as the year
progresses. This process, however,
should not be done in isolation of the students' concerns. The result is a class in which ownership is
shared. This ensures that everyone will
take pride in and care for the class's social and physical atmosphere. In the same way the curriculum should be
determined; as a teacher I am ultimately responsible, but in order for kids to
appreciate what is being taught, they will have input into the curriculum
delivery. Parents and guardians, I
strongly believe, ought to be part of the decision making process knowing that
they are already a large part of the students' educational lives. Harmony between me–the teacher–and parents
will only better promote a positive relationship between the home and the
school[1], noting
what Simons explains that parents occupy an invisible presence in the
classroom.[2] However, in cases where parents contribute
little to a child's education, I must be prepared to adjust my teaching
strategy to compensate for this lack of learning at home. This may simply involve extra encouragement. Knowledge
must be real to children for it to be meaningful. The curriculum must reinforce this
meaningfulness. I believe that while
teachers often disperse information, until it becomes meaningful or until it
begins to make sense in the mind of the student, only then does it become
knowledge. In other words, knowledge is
information that makes logical sense and has meaning to a child. A student's knowledge can be verified if the
student can, in essence, use the acquired information–now knowledge–and
re-teach it in numerous styles. This can
take the form of testing, presenting, or a host of other media. Teaching
should first manifest integrity, without which it lacks believability and
ultimately truth. At all costs, children
should be pointed towards truth. By
embodying integrity within the classroom my role will be both visible and
invisible. The role will be visible as
students require that I guide them to new knowledge, and when I pass this
knowledge to them and it becomes their own, I will metaphorically slip out of
existence which will reinforce their ownership and confidence. This results in neither a teacher- or
student-centered classroom, rather a subject-centered one.[3] I
believe that a healthy school is an active participant in a healthy community;
in fact, they build on each other.
Further, a healthy school is one that practices respect inwardly and
outwardly. It is by using this paramount
philosophy of respect that will benefit all that come into contact with members
of a this healthy school. As such, those
practicing to treat others in the way they would wish to be treated will hinder
injustice.[4] Injustice will be further tackled by teaching
as close as possible to objective awareness on issues. This comes from the belief that all cultures
contribute equally to humanity. [1]
Colorosa, Barbara. Kids are Worth It! Penguin Books, [2]
Palmer, Parker. The Courage to Teach. Jossey-Bass, [3]
Handbook for New Teachers: [4] Simons,
Deborah. “Dealing with Difficult
Parents.” American Association of |
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
[ resource | technology | professional | resume | photos ] |